|
|
|
El derecho a la libertad de pensamiento y expresión en la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.
Manuel E. Ventura Robles.
En: Jurisprudencia argentina.
Fascículo 12 (2015)
|
|
|
|
Resumen:
El presente artículo comienza introduciendo
sobre la importancia que ha venido adquiriendo el tema de la libertad
de pensamiento y expresión en la jurisprudencia de la Corte
Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Se refiere además a la Opinión
Consultiva OC-5/85 sobre la Colegiación Obligatoria de Periodistas,
y asimismo detalla información sobre la jurisprudencia contenciosa en
materia de libertad de pensamiento y expresión.
|
|
|
|
¿Qué futuro espera al Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos?
Dinah Shelton.
En: Jurisprudencia argentina.
Fascículo 12 (2015)
|
|
|
|
Resumen:
En este artículo, Dinah Shelton abarca
información relevante sobre el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos
Humanos: Su historia, sus funciones y facultades, la Secretaría, la
situación de la recepción de medidas cautelares y la admisibilidad de
peticiones. La autora concluye el escrito refiriéndose
a algunas cuestiones sobre el futuro de la Comisión.
|
|
|
|
La complejidad del principio
Pro Homine.
Zlata Drnas de Clément.
En: Jurisprudencia argentina.
Fascículo 12 (2015)
|
|
|
|
Resumen: En el presente trabajo
se considera el "ambiente" en el que se ha generado y desarrollado el principio
pro homine;
las variadas percepciones conceptuales del mismo, sus notas
características, el rol que cumple en el Sistema de Protección de los
Derechos Humanos y los desafíos de futuro que se
le presentan.
|
|
|
|
La emergencia del
ius standi de la persona ante la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos: El
ius cogens superveniens y la "materia odiosa".
Rolando E. Gialdino.
En: Jurisprudencia argentina.
Fascículo 12 (2015)
|
|
|
|
Resumen: Se tratan los siguientes
temas: El principio de igualdad como norma de ius cogens, la igualdad de las partes en el proceso como norma de
ius cogens derivada del principio de igualdad, las consecuencias que origina la desigualdad de las partes en materia de
ius standi en el proceso ante la Comisión IDH, el
locus standi
in iudicio de la persona ante la Corte IDH,
ius cogens Versus
ius dispositivum, obligaciones
erga omnes, el
ius cogens superviens y el derecho intertemporal, entre otras temáticas.
|
|
|
|
Towards a uniform basis for the right to identity in the normative framework of the American Convention on Human Rights.
Romina I. Sijniensky y Alexander Aizenstatd.
En: Inter-American and European Human Rights Journal.
No. 1 (2014)
|
|
|
|
Resumen:
The right to identity
has surfaced in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human
Rights mostly in cases dealing with enforced disappearance of children.
Although not a right that is independently defined in the Convention,
the Court has declared its existence through
the interpretation of several other rights. The rights from which
identity has been derived have not been uniform and vary from case to
case. This lack of uniformity can create difficulties in the future by
limiting the applicability of the right to cases
of enforced disappearance of children. We propose that in order to have
a uniform basis for the right to identity which is not dependent on
fact specific situations and does not hinder its possible application in
the future to cases not related to children,
the right to identity should be derived from Article 11(2) of the
American Convention on Human Rights.
|
|
|
|
The independence and impartiality in the Inter-American Court's jurisprudence: The specific case of judges' arbitral removal.
Gaetano D'Avino, Daniela Fanciullo, Anna Iermano, Angela Martone y Rossana Palladino.
En: Inter-American and European Human Rights Journal.
No. 1 (2014)
|
|
|
|
Resumen:
This
work focuses on the independence and impartiality of domestic judges
and tribunals, startingfrom a comment on three IACtHR judgments: Chocrón
Chocrón v. Venezuela,
1 July 2008; Reverón-Trujillo v. Venezuela, 30 June 2009; Apitz Barbera
et al. v. Venezuela, 5 August 2008. As is well known, to ensure due
process, Article 8(1) of the ACHR enshrines that every person has the
right to a hearing by an independent and impartial
tribunal. Given the relevance of this guarantee, the so-called "fraudulent res judicata"
can result from a trial in which the rules of due process have not been
respected, or when judges
have not acted with independence and impartiality. Furthermore, Article
27(2) of the ACHR provides for the non-suspension of judicial
guarantees essential to the protection of fundamental human rights in
state of emergency.
|
|
|
|
Resuscitating justice: The Inter-American Court confronts the entrenched impunity of national amnesty laws.
Jeffrey Davis.
En: Inter-American and European Human Rights Journal.
No. 1 (2014)
|
|
|
|
Resumen:
Amnesty laws are
perhaps the most formidable barrier to accountability for human rights
violations in Latin America. This article examines how the
Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) confronted these amnesty
laws and the effect of its rulings in a number of cases.
It analyses the Barrios Altos case, Almonacid Arellano v. Chile, Gelman
v. Peru and Gomes Lund v. Brazil to make the following arguments: (1)
the IACtHR established and developed the right to truth through its
decisions in these amnesty cases; (2) through
these decisions, the IACtHR enables legal accountability in the nations
from which these cases arose; and, (3) despite these accomplishments,
significant barriers to accountability remain.
|
|
|
|
Judging the case against same-sex marriage.
Andrew Koppelman.
En: University of Illinois Law Review.
No. 2 (2014)
|
|
|
|
Resumen:
The movement for
same-sex marriage has been politically triumphant, but its case is
incomplete because the arguments against it have not been understood.
Major social change should not occur without addressing the claims made
by same-sex marriage opponents. This piece presents
and critiques consequentialist and nonconsequentialist arguments
against same-sex marriage. The consequentialist arguments rely on claims
that legalizing same-sex marriage will lead to disastrous societal and
familial effects. The nonconsequentialist arguments
rest on claims that marriage is an inherently heterosexual institution.
The article concludes that none of these arguments have merit.
|
|
|
|
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario